Online First
About Online First
The Online First section provides immediate access to accepted articles before they are assigned to a specific journal issue. Each article is considered the final version of record. Once assigned to a scheduled issue, the DOI remains unchanged.
Complete bibliographic information
DOI registration
Abstract and keywords
Full-text PDF
Citation information
Article metrics
Faster dissemination
Earlier visibility
Permanent DOI
Global accessibility
Reduced delay
Articles — Online First
Existing digital-government maturity models often emphasize internal administrative capabilities, citizen-facing services, or aggregate these dimensions into a single maturity construct, providing limited insight into how the two evolve as an integrated system. This paper develops the Twin-Process Digital Architecture (TPDA). This conceptual framework reconceptualizes digital transformation as the synchronized evolution of internal administrative processes (Track A) and citizen-facing service delivery (Track B). Grounded in Public Value Theory and informed by street-level bureaucracy and co-creation scholarship, TPDA connects the two tracks through an integration layer comprising data interoperability, API-enabled system integration, and AI orchestration. The framework proposes a four-stage joint maturity roadmap - digitization, interoperability, AI integration, and co-creation - and introduces the synchronization gap as a diagnostic concept for identifying uneven development between the two tracks. Positioned as a meso-level complement to macro-level digital-government architectures, TPDA offers a relational perspective on coordinating administrative capacity and citizen-facing services. The paper contributes a conceptual framework, a practical diagnostic roadmap for public managers, and testable propositions for future empirical research.
Smart governance
digital transformation
public value
twin-process architecture
AI orchestration
data interoperability
street-level bureaucracy
citizen trust
This research examines the role of public employment reform in improving budget efficiency and governance quality in Viet Nam during 2015 - 2023, the available empirical period corresponding to the implementation of civil service reform under the Politburo’s Resolution No. 39-NQ/TW dated April 17, 2015, on downsizing and restructuring of cadres, civil servants and public employees. Drawing on New Public Management (NPM) and comparative public administration reform literature, the study uses a balanced provincial panel dataset covering 63 provincial-level administrative units over nine years, yielding 567 province-year observations. The analysis estimates Pooled OLS, Fixed Effects (FE), and Random Effects (RE) models and applies the Hausman specification test to identify the preferred panel-data estimator. The findings indicate that staff reduction is positively associated with budget efficiency and governance quality. At the same time, digital transformation is directly related to better governance outcomes and strengthens the relationship between downsizing and governance quality. Training investment has a modest positive association with governance performance. In contrast, the wage reform index is not consistently significant, suggesting that wage reform has not yet been sufficiently linked to performance-based incentives. The study concludes that public employment reform can generate meaningful gains in state performance when integrated with digital transformation, professional capacity-building, and institutional accountability. The Vietnamese case offers useful lessons for developing countries seeking to modernize public administration under fiscal and institutional constraints.
Public employment reform
budget efficiency
governance quality
civil service downsizing
digital transformation
Viet Nam
New Public Management
panel-data regression
This policy-oriented review examines the theoretical and institutional foundations of commune-level development data governance in the context of Viet Nam’s two-tier local government model and evolving national data architecture. Drawing on legal and policy documents, academic literature, and authoritative international sources, it identifies institutional design gaps between commune-level development responsibilities and the data conditions needed to carry them out. The article proposes two closely related concepts: Commune-Level Development Data Governance (CDDG) and the Responsibility-Data Alignment Framework (RDAF). RDAF systematizes the relationships among governance responsibilities, functional data needs, data rights, operational mechanisms, data-use capacity, and public value. This analysis focuses on institutional design rather than the empirical performance of individual localities.
Data governance
digital government
commune-level government
commune-level development data governance
responsibility-data alignment
public value