Improving power control mechanism in the Socialist Rule-of-Law State of Vietnam: a modern theoretical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59394/JSM.141Keywords:
Power control, socialist rule-of-law state, accountability, digital governance, social oversight, public integrityAbstract
This article analyzes the theoretical foundations, current situation, and directions for improving power control mechanisms in the Socialist Rule-of-Law State of Vietnam. Based on the 2013 Constitution and Resolution No. 27-NQ/TW of 2022, the study argues that effective power control should not rely solely on the allocation and separation of powers but should be designed through a multidimensional approach that integrates institutional control, accountability, social oversight, and digital governance. The findings indicate that Vietnam has made significant progress in developing e-government, combating corruption, and enhancing transparency in public administration. However, challenges remain regarding accountability mechanisms, data interoperability, and the effectiveness of oversight of power. On this basis, the article proposes institutional reforms to strengthen early and preventive control mechanisms, clearly define individual responsibilities, develop integrated public data systems, promote social oversight, and foster a culture of integrity in the exercise of state power.
References
Ackerman, J. M. (2005). Social accountability in the public sector: A conceptual discussion (Social Development Papers: Participation and Civic Engagement No. 82). World Bank.
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead - Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. SAGE.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Montesquieu. (1989). The spirit of the laws (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. S. Stone, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1748)
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-agent models: An expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173-202. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
