Developing and Exploratorily Validating a Digital Competence Framework for University Lecturers: Development in the Context of Digital Transformation in Ho Chi Minh City

Authors

  • Anh Nguyen Vo
  • Anh Quan Tuan
  • Phong Nguyen Linh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59394/JSM.153

Keywords:

Digital competence, university lecturers, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, exploratory factor analysis

Abstract

This study develops and provides initial exploratory evidence for a 25-item digital competence instrument for university lecturers and describes self-perceived competence among 350 lecturers at five public higher education institutions in Ho Chi Minh City. The instrument covers six domains and was developed by mapping Viet Nam’s National Digital Competence Framework against DigCompEdu, UNESCO ICT-CFT, DigComp 2.2, and the AI Competency Framework for Teachers. Content validity was reviewed by 15 experts, followed by a pilot survey of 30 lecturers. In the main sample, exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring and Oblimin rotation supported a six-factor solution; domain reliability ranged from α = .810-.872 and ω = .811-.872. General digital skills had the highest domain mean (M = 4.10, SD = 0.69), whereas AI in teaching and professional development had the lowest mean and greatest dispersion (M = 3.41, SD = 0.82). The findings provide initial exploratory support for the proposed structure and identify priorities for professional development; they do not establish a confirmed measurement model or actual performance competence.

Author Biographies

Anh Nguyen Vo

MA. Nguyen Vo Anh
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

Anh Quan Tuan

MA. Quan Tuan Anh
Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics

Phong Nguyen Linh

Dr. Nguyen Linh Phong
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

References

Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Ministry of Education and Training. (2026). Circular No. 18/2026/TT-BGDDT dated March 27, 2026, promulgating the Digital Competency Framework for teachers and managers of preschool, general education, and continuing education institutions.https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?docid=217451&pageid=27160

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

OECD. (2025a). Preparing teachers for digital education: Continuing professional learning on digital skills and pedagogies (OECD Education Policy Perspectives No. 122). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/af442d7a-en

OECD. (2025b). Results from TALIS 2024 - Country notes: Viet Nam. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024-country-notes_e127f9e2-en/viet-nam_2a361394-en.html

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers: Version 3. UNESCO.

Vincent-Lancrin, S., & van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges (OECD Education Working Papers No. 218). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a6c90fa9-en

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens-with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

26-09-2026

How to Cite

Nguyen Vo , A., Quan Tuan, A., & Nguyen Linh, P. (2026). Developing and Exploratorily Validating a Digital Competence Framework for University Lecturers: Development in the Context of Digital Transformation in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of State Management , 33(21), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.59394/JSM.153

Issue

Section

Contents

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.